Todd Creek Farms Homeowners Association Lawsuit Article

Overview of the Todd Creek Farms HOA Lawsuit

Todd Creek Farms Homeowners Association Lawsuit Article: The Todd Creek Farms Homeowners Association (HOA), located in Brighton, Colorado, has become the center of a high-stakes legal battle involving allegations of financial mismanagement, self-dealing, and attempts by homeowners to hold the board accountable. The dispute escalated when 31 homeowners filed a lawsuit accusing the HOA board and its president, Jason Pardikes, of improperly awarding lucrative contracts and ignoring requests for transparency.

In July 2025, the HOA filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, citing spiraling legal defense costs as justification. This move has drawn scrutiny from both the plaintiffs and public commentators, who question whether the HOA is truly insolvent or whether bankruptcy is being used strategically to delay accountability.

The legal saga is multi-layered, involving derivative claims, motions for receivership, court orders, and counterclaims. This article breaks down the key components of the dispute to help homeowners, legal observers, and other HOAs learn from the case.

Claims & Allegations by Homeowners

At the heart of the lawsuit are derivative claims that the HOA board breached fiduciary duties by engaging in self-dealing and financial irregularities.

Key allegations include:

• The HOA allegedly agreed to pay Method Landscaping more than $214,700 in 2020 for services that should have cost around $27,000.
• The plaintiffs assert that Pardikes had undisclosed ties or beneficial interest in Method Landscaping and may have personally profited from the contract.
• When homeowners formally requested financial records and relevant documentation, the board allegedly refused or ignored those document requests.
• The way certain board members were reappointed or shuffled in 2022—apparently without public notice—has been framed as a deliberate strategy to maintain control and avoid scrutiny.

Because the suit is filed derivatively on behalf of the HOA, it means the plaintiffs claim to act in the HOA’s interest, alleging that the board’s misconduct harmed the association and its membership.

The lawsuit also includes a motion seeking the appointment of a receiver under Colorado procedural rules (C.R.C.P. 66(a)), to oversee the HOA’s operations impartially amid allegations of board mismanagement.

HOA’s Defense & The Bankruptcy Filing

In response, the HOA and its board members, including Pardikes and others, strongly deny wrongdoing. They argue that the plaintiffs are disgruntled homeowners attempting to overturn governance decisions they lost at the ballot box.

The HOA’s public justification for the Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing centers on the financial strain of defending the lawsuit:

• The board claimed that legal fees for defending the homeowners’ suit had already exceeded $800,000.
• It asserts that continuing litigation poses unpredictable and uninsurable legal risk that could jeopardize the HOA and burden all homeowners with special assessments.
• The board insists the bankruptcy was not triggered by mismanagement or immediate vendor default, but by the need to halt financial “bleed” and protect homeowners broadly

However, critics—including the plaintiffs’ counsel—question whether the HOA truly is insolvent or whether the bankruptcy is a tactic to delay or derail accountability in state court.
One of the central legal puzzles is whether the HOA’s assets exceed its liabilities (i.e. whether it is solvent). The plaintiffs plan to challenge the legitimacy of the filing by asking the bankruptcy court to determine whether it was made in good faith.

As of mid-2025, the bankruptcy case is docketed under Case No. 1:25-bk-14385 in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado, before Judge Kimberley H. Tyson.

Procedural Milestones & Court Actions

The litigation has already produced multiple significant procedural steps and rulings:

1. Motions to Dismiss
   Both the HOA and individual board members filed motions to dismiss. Those motions have been denied or held moot in various court orders, allowing the plaintiffs to proceed.
2. Amended Complaints & Exhibits
   The plaintiffs have filed amended versions of their complaint, responding to the motions to dismiss and attaching detailed exhibits including financial audits and tax records.
3. Receiver Motion
   In late 2024, the plaintiffs formally requested that a receiver be appointed under Colorado law, arguing that current board control is compromised and mismanagement is ongoing.
4. Bankruptcy Proceedings & Docket Updates
   Since the Chapter 11 filing on July 15, 2025, there have been multiple entries in the bankruptcy docket, including motions to dismiss, orders vacating hearings, and expansion of trustee duties.
   For example, on September 22, 2025, a hearing on a motion to dismiss was vacated and held in abeyance pending further order.
   The bankruptcy debtor’s counsel is Allen Vellone Wolf Helfrich & Factor P.C., with a Subchapter V trustee structure engaged.
5. Trial Delays & Strategic Impacts
   The bankruptcy filing likely postpones or suspends the state-court jury trial originally set for 2026. 
   The interplay between state derivative litigation and federal bankruptcy proceedings will require careful coordination or conflict resolution by courts.

Taken together, these steps show a complex, multifront legal battle involving state court oversight and federal bankruptcy review.

Key Legal Issues & Risks

Several critical legal issues and risks underpin this case:

• Good Faith vs. Bad Faith Bankruptcy Filing
  One of the biggest questions: Was the Chapter 11 filing made in good faith? If not, the court may dismiss or convert it. The plaintiffs argue it’s being used as a shield rather than financial necessity.
• Derivative Standing & Authority
  Because the homeowners bring suit derivatively (i.e. on behalf of the HOA), they must show the board breached duties and that internal demand or exhaustion was futile. Courts will scrutinize whether procedural steps were valid.
• Receivership Appointment
  If the court grants the motion for a receiver, that person may step in to manage finances, enforce contracts, and oversee governance—potentially sidelining the existing board. That is a serious shift in power
• Conflict of Interest & Self-Dealing
  The allegation that Pardikes had direct or indirect control of Method Landscaping raises serious questions of conflict of interest, which is central to fiduciary duty law. Proving such a connection is essential.
• Asset Valuation & Solvency
  The courts will examine whether the HOA’s assets exceed liabilities (i.e. whether the organization is truly insolvent) to determine if bankruptcy was justified.
• Impact on Homeowners & Assessments
  If litigation continues, the HOA board warns it may impose special assessments on all homeowners to cover costs. That raises the stakes and may galvanize broader community opposition.

Each of these issues involves detailed factual and legal battles ahead.

Implications & Lessons for HOAs and Homeowners

The Todd Creek Farms case offers rich lessons for both HOAs and homeowner communities:

1. Governance & Transparency Are Critical
   Transparent contracting, board rotation, and financial oversight can prevent suspicion and litigation. Hidden deals or lack of disclosure create fertile ground for abuse claims.
2. Homeowner Demand Rights Matter
   In derivative actions, courts often require that the plaintiffs issue a formal demand on the board to act before suing. HOAs should maintain clear records and responses to document compliance.
3. Bankruptcy as a Tactical Tool
   This case illustrates how a nonprofit HOA might use bankruptcy not just for rescue, but strategically to delay liability. Courts must guard against misuse.
4. Legal Costs Are Burdensome
   Litigation, expert analysis, accounting audits—all come with heavy costs. HOAs must budget for disputes or resist litigating unnecessarily. The $800K+ legal cost figure is a stark warning.
5. Homeowners Should Stay Engaged
   Even if many homeowners remain silent, a small group can push for accountability. Maintaining vigilance, demanding document access, and participating in elections can protect against board overreach.
6. Court Interplay Is Complex
   When state derivative suits interface with federal bankruptcy, coordination and precedence issues arise. Legal counsel must navigate dual systems.

In short, the Todd Creek Farms lawsuit underscores that community governance should never be opaque or centralized without checks and balances.

Conclusion

The Todd Creek Farms HOA lawsuit is a striking example of how disputes within residential communities can escalate into high-stakes legal battles. From claims of secret contracts and self-dealing, to a dramatic Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing, this case spotlights constitutional and fiduciary tensions in HOA governance. As the procedural drama unfolds—with motions, receivership requests, amended complaints, and bankruptcy hearings— the outcome will likely leave a lasting imprint on how homeowners associations are held accountable.

For existing HOAs and community groups, the warning is clear: governance must be transparent, contracts must be fair, and checks on power must be real. For homeowners, active oversight and willingness to demand accountability can provide far more protection than passive membership.

If you like, I can also prepare a timeline infographic, a plain-language summary, or a “what to do if your HOA is misbehaving” guide tuned to this case. Would you like me to produce one of those?

FAQs

1. What is a derivative lawsuit in the context of an HOA?
   A derivative lawsuit is filed on behalf of the HOA by one or more homeowners, claiming that the board breached fiduciary duties or harmed the association. Plaintiffs must often show they requested the board act (or that doing so would have been futile) and that the wrongdoing harmed the HOA’s interests.
2. Can an HOA legally file for bankruptcy protection?
   Yes—nonprofit associations like an HOA may file for Chapter 11 to reorganize or protect assets. But courts will carefully examine whether the filing is made in good faith and whether the HOA truly needs it or is abusing it defensively.
3. What does a court-appointed receiver do?
   A receiver takes control over finances, contracts, and operations of the entity under court supervision, independent of management. In HOA disputes, this can neutralize a board accused of misconduct while the case proceeds.
4. How might this affect homeowners not involved in the lawsuit?
   If the HOA incurs enormous legal fees, it may seek special assessments on all members to recoup costs. Also, any decisions or restructuring driven by bankruptcy or receivership could change services, rules, or finances for the entire community.
5. What should HOA boards do to avoid lawsuits like this?
6. Maintain transparent contracting and avoid conflicts of interest

• Keep detailed financial and audit records
• Provide open access to documentation when asked by members
• Rotate board seats properly and follow election procedures
• Budget for litigation risk and avoid suppression of dissent

Let me know if you want any deeper breakdowns or a downloadable PDF version.

Admin