Doug Kalmer Solar Panels Savings Article

Admin
10 Min Read
Doug Kalmer Solar Panels Savings Article

Who Is Doug Kalmer & What Kind of Solar Setup He Has

Doug Kalmer Solar Panels Savings Article: Doug Kalmer is an established figure in the DIY/solar home movement. He builds, experiments, and documents numerous renewable energy projects, especially solar, passive solar homes, solar water heating, and space heating systems.

Some of his key systems and background:

  • He built a passive solar, earth-sheltered home in Tennessee in the 1980s.
  • He’s created multiple solar projects: solar water heaters, solar hot air collectors, PV-powered systems, etc.
  • In more recent years, he installed a grid-tied solar electric array (20 panels originally) and later added a second hybrid system: roof and ground mounted panels + battery storage + grid connection.

Because of his varied systems, his experience offers a realistic case study in long-term solar savings, payback periods, and what can be expected from well-designed DIY + grid-tied solar systems.


How Much Doug’s Solar System Has Saved: Electric Bills & Profit

Doug’s solar journey shows that such systems can move beyond savings into actual income / profit. Key highlights include:

  • He installed his original 20-panel system in 2011. Since then, he hasn’t had a conventional electric bill
  • The system has produced enough power that, in many months, the utility company owes him credit for excess electricity he feeds into the grid. For example, his latest bill at the time of the report was a −$40.42, meaning the utility company owed him money.
  • The original investment in his system reportedly paid itself off by 2017 — about 6 years after installation. From then on, all generation beyond covering his needs has been “profit.”

Additionally, the revenue from this excess energy has allowed him to invest in further solar infrastructure (battery storage, extra panels), further enhancing the savings.

So in short: no electric bill, profit after payback, and ongoing earnings from selling back to the grid.


The Components of His Setup & How They Maximize Savings

Understanding why Doug Kalmer’s solar panels deliver such strong savings requires analyzing how his system is built:

Grid-tied + net metering
Because his major PV array is grid-tied, he can send excess energy to the grid and receive credits or payments for it. That’s a major reason the system delivers not just savings, but income.

Second hybrid system
He didn’t stop at the first system — he added a hybrid system with both roof and ground panels plus a battery. This gives him energy storage for times when sun is low or grid is offline, increasing the amount of personal usage vs wasted output.

DIY / cost savings on labor
A significant part of the cost savings is because Doug does much of the work himself (building, installing, maintaining). That lowers upfront costs and maintenance costs over time.

Maintenance is minimal
As Doug reports, beyond occasional cleaning (removing debris), there isn’t much ongoing maintenance needed. Panels are durable and “low maintenance.”

Design choices
Passive solar elements (good insulation, “earth-sheltered” home) significantly reduce heating/cooling loads. Solar hot water and hybrid systems (with storage) allow better usage of energy. All of these reduce what must be supplied by the electric company.

These features together push the return on investment (ROI) higher, shorten payback time, and maximize net savings.


Financial Outcomes: Payback Period, Profit, & Long-Term Value

With that setup, let’s look at the financial consequences of Doug Kalmer’s solar investment.

  • Payback Period: Although the upfront cost is nontrivial, Doug’s original system reportedly paid for itself by 2017, which means about 6 years or so from the 2011 installation date.
  • Profit Since Payback: After the payback date, everything the system produces (beyond internal consumption) is pure “profit” (minus marginal maintenance). So for years now he has been essentially making money from solar.
  • Energy Cost Zeroed Out: Because his bill has been zero (except when he gets credits for sending power back), he has eliminated his monthly electric costs. That means full relief from traditional electric cost inflation.
  • Additional Income from Selling Back to Grid: There are months where the utility company owes him money — he’s being paid for surplus power. That adds a recurring income stream.
  • Reinvestment & System Growth: He used his savings / profits to add new solar panels (second hybrid system) and battery storage, amplifying his earning and savings potential.

Over a long time horizon (10-20+ years), these kinds of savings accumulate into large sums. Growing systems, inflation of utility costs, and longevity of equipment (with minimal breakdowns) all play in his favor.


Lessons & Best Practices from Doug Kalmer’s Experience

Doug’s experience isn’t just an anecdote — there are practical lessons others can follow to replicate similar savings.

  • Conserve first: Reducing electricity usage via insulation, weather stripping, efficient appliances etc. → this reduces how big your solar system needs to be. Doug emphasizes that energy conservation is key for maximizing efficiency.
  • DIY where possible: Doing your own labor (if you have the skills) cuts the biggest cost. People often overpay for labor / installation.
  • Use net metering / grid tie: Systems that allow feeding excess power back to the grid dramatically improve ROI.
  • Include battery storage if affordable and if you want power during outages or peak demand times. It increases system cost, but also increases usage of generated power and reduces wastage.
  • Design passive solar aspects: Homes built or retrofitted for good insulation, passive heat gain, earth sheltering etc. require less energy overall. Doug’s passive solar house, greenhouses, and efficient features help reduce heating/cooling overhead.
  • Evaluate local incentives and feed-in tariffs: Incentives, credits, and utility policies vary by region; favorable net metering or compensation for exported solar power helps a lot.

These principles show that savings depend both on hardware (panels, batteries) and smart design and usage.


Should You Expect Similar Savings? What to Watch Out For & Variables That Affect Results

Doug’s example is inspiring, but not everyone will get exactly the same numbers. Here are variables / pitfalls to consider, so expectations remain realistic:

Variable How it affects savings / payback
Sunlight / Geographic Location More sun (more kWh per panel per day) = faster payback. Cloudy / shaded or high latitude regions produce less.
Electric rates & utility policy Areas with high electricity rates + strong net metering policies yield larger savings. Where electricity is cheap or solar credit rates are low, savings are smaller.
Upfront costs Equipment cost, installation, permitting, battery cost — higher upfront means longer payback. DIY helps reduce costs.
Maintenance / system losses Dirt, shading, panel degradation, inverter failures can cut performance. If not maintained, output drops.
Energy consumption patterns If you use a lot of power at night or when solar output is low, battery storage or grid reliance may reduce savings. Usage during daylight = more direct use = better return.
Incentives, tax credits, rebates Federal/state/local incentives can shift costs significantly. Reduction or removal of these can affect financial returns.

Given these, someone in Doug’s position in Tennessee with good sun and net metering is well placed to replicate similar savings. But in less favorable climates or with high costs, payback might be longer.


Summary & Key Takeaways

  • Doug Kalmer is a proven example of solar savings: no electric bills since installing his original array in 2011, and profitable since payback (~2017).
  • His setups combine grid-tied systems, DIY work, energy conservation, passive solar design, and battery storage to maximize value.
  • The result is zero electric bill, credit or payment from utility, reinvestment in more solar capacity.
  • For someone considering solar, his experience shows that payback periods of ~5-7 years (depending on cost / incentives) are possible with good design and favorable conditions.
  • But results vary: location, sun exposure, electric rates, installation cost, maintenance, and usage all matter.

If you’re evaluating solar for your home or property, using Doug’s model as a basis (lower costs, conservation, grid tie) and running your own numbers (local solar insolation, utility rates, incentives) will help determine whether you can achieve similar savings.

Share This Article